<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maggie Jackson &#187; fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maggie-jackson.com/tag/fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maggie-jackson.com</link>
	<description>Author of Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming Dark Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Busy. We&#8217;re Productive. But In What Sense of the Word?</title>
		<link>http://maggie-jackson.com/2009/03/11/were-busy-were-productive-but-in-what-sense-of-the-word/</link>
		<comments>http://maggie-jackson.com/2009/03/11/were-busy-were-productive-but-in-what-sense-of-the-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Distracted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[busyness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maggie-jackson.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re so busy, so &#8220;productive,&#8221; ticking off items off our agendas, clicking through over-stuffed in-boxes. But in what sense are we <em>productive </em>? Could it be that we are racing<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> ahead</span> in the most shallow senses of the word?</p> <p> This is a particularly timely question as we reap the fall-out from an era of <span>. . . <a href="http://maggie-jackson.com/2009/03/11/were-busy-were-productive-but-in-what-sense-of-the-word/">read more</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re so busy, so &#8220;productive,&#8221; ticking off items off our agendas, clicking through over-stuffed in-boxes. But in what sense are we <em>productive </em>? Could it be that we are racing<span style="text-decoration: underline;"> ahead</span> in the most shallow senses of the word?</p>
<p> This is a particularly timely question as we reap the fall-out from an era of unprecedented, and often unthinking abundance. By unthinking, I mean activity without thought to consequence, to ourselves and others. Activity without perspective, especially on the future. Isn&#8217;t that the core of what&#8217;s been happening in terms of the environment, crimes like Madoff&#8217;s, and even the disintegration of deep family rhythms and rituals?</p>
<p>A short but important column in the U.K.&#8217;s <a href="http://http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/mar/07/stress-health-wellbeing-psychology">Guardian</a> newpaper this past weekend drives to the heart of this question of the cult of busyness.</p>
<p>&#8220;Telling ourselves we&#8217;re hugely stressed makes us feel important, in demand, even energised; it also gives us permission to avoid confronting deeper issues,&#8221; writes Oliver Burkeman.</p>
<p> He writes, &#8220;&#8230; busyness is the perfect excuse: if you&#8217;re convinced that you&#8217;re overstretched and overwhelmed, you&#8217;re spared the terrifying prospect of actually doing the things, and making the changes, that you want &#8211; or say that you want, since busyness spares you from examining that question, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>  Notice the word &#8220;terrifying.&#8221; Burkeman&#8217;s comments remind me of a man I met at a futurist conference who spoke glowingly of his new cell phone that worked globally. (This was a while back.) He told the audience, &#8220;Now, I never have to be alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>  Yes, it&#8217;s often terrifying to be alone with oneself. And it&#8217;s terrifying to take responsibility for ourselves &#8211; and for the care and keeping of our world.</p>
<p>   Addendum: A site called <a href="http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/category/author-speaks-series/">Sharp Brains </a>and a blog called <a href="http://neuronarrative.wordpress.com/2009/02/23/attention-under-siege-an-interview-with-author-maggie-jackson/">Neuronarrative</a> both have posted email-interviews with me about <em>Distracted. </em>In both cases, the questions were intriguing.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://maggie-jackson.com/2009/03/11/were-busy-were-productive-but-in-what-sense-of-the-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
